<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writing Hurts &#187; boring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writinghurts.com/tag/boring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writinghurts.com</link>
	<description>Media as a contact sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:26:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The problem with the Next Big Thing</title>
		<link>http://www.writinghurts.com/2008/04/12/the-problem-with-the-next-big-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.writinghurts.com/2008/04/12/the-problem-with-the-next-big-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking/ social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writinghurts.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the fall of 2006, I went to a conference with editors and publishers from the chain I was working at. It was a mix of a few small dailies, like the one where I was city editor and metros. We all paid close attention to a presentation about how we needed to change, restructure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fall of 2006, I went to a conference with editors and publishers from the chain I was working at. It was a mix of a few small dailies, like the one where I was city editor and metros. We all paid close attention to a presentation about how we needed to change, restructure the newsroom, our Web sites and our print products. Then we broke up into small groups to think of projects we could do.</p>
<p>When it came time to announce our ideas, every group had the same theme: MySpace for ___. One group wanted to make MySpace for pets. Another wanted to make MySpace into a glossy print product featuring high school athletes. You get the idea.</p>
<p>When we were leaving, I asked my publisher what she thought, and she was pretty pleased with all of the ideas. Her take was that MySpace was so successful, why shouldn&#8217;t we use their idea to make money? What she missed was that MySpace (and Facebook, and Google, and Flickr and any number of other successful ideas) succeeded because it did something new and interesting. Taking an idea and barely re-working it doesn&#8217;t qualify as innovation. Especially when you miss the point entirely, like the glossy magazine people did.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;m writing this, I logged into MySpace for the first time in weeks. In 2006, I logged in every day. If you&#8217;d have told me then that things like Facebook and Twitter would have replaced that, I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;d have believed you. And I&#8217;m sure the reaction at the conference would have been along the lines of &#8220;What&#8217;s Twitter?&#8221;</p>
<p>There are plenty of great ideas floating around out there, and people in the media have them. Instead of trying to just re-purpose things that other people have done, we need to implement those truly new and original ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.writinghurts.com/2008/04/12/the-problem-with-the-next-big-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
