<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writing Hurts &#187; case study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writinghurts.com/tag/case-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writinghurts.com</link>
	<description>Media as a contact sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:26:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>So what sets you apart?</title>
		<link>http://www.writinghurts.com/2009/05/29/so-what-sets-you-apart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.writinghurts.com/2009/05/29/so-what-sets-you-apart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social networking/ social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising and Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Client-side]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Success]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writinghurts.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Fleet has an interesting piece on social media as a commodity on Social Media Today. He&#8217;s mostly concerned with marketing, but the points he makes hold true for media-types, as well. What do clients care about? Ideas - creative, strategic ideas that solve a problem and accomplish objectives Integrated solutions &#8211; approaches that bring [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Fleet has an <a href="http://www.socialmediatoday.com/SMC/97338" target="_blank">interesting piece</a> on social media as a commodity on <a class="zem_slink" title="Social Media Today" rel="homepage" href="http://www.socialmediatoday.com">Social Media Today</a>.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s mostly concerned with marketing, but the points he makes hold true for media-types, as well.</p>
<blockquote><p>What do clients care about?</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Ideas </strong>- creative, strategic ideas that solve a problem and accomplish objectives</li>
<li><strong>Integrated solutions</strong> &#8211; approaches that bring together disciplines into a strategic approach</li>
<li><strong>Understanding</strong> &#8211; a clear knowledge and grasp of the issues that matter to them</li>
<li><strong>Rounded team</strong> &#8211; a well-formed team that covers all the bases</li>
<li><strong>Chemistry</strong> &#8211; a team that gels with the client-side team personally as well as professionally</li>
<li><strong>Thought leadership</strong> &#8211; demonstrated leadership in the areas that matter</li>
<li>Success &#8211; documented case studies &#8211; the one area in which, for now, being a first mover gives the advantage.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>So which of these do you offer to your media company? Or to your readers and viewers? If you don&#8217;t offer any of these, why not? We thought social media was going to catch on, but how many of us thought about what would be next?</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.writinghurts.com/2009/05/29/so-what-sets-you-apart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polaroid and newspapers</title>
		<link>http://www.writinghurts.com/2008/04/14/polaroid-and-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.writinghurts.com/2008/04/14/polaroid-and-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gloomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polaroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the future?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zink]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writinghurts.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story of Polaroid is a sad one. The once-mighty photo company recently announced that it would stop making the instant film that made it a househould name. This came after a bankruptcy and a re-invention where most things with the Polaroid brand are made by someone else. You can&#8217;t even buy an instant camera [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story of Polaroid is a sad one. The once-mighty photo company recently announced that it would <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/08/AR2008020803598.html" target="_blank">stop making the instant film</a> that made it a househould name. This came after a bankruptcy and a re-invention where most things with the Polaroid brand are made by someone else. You can&#8217;t even buy an instant camera anymore.</p>
<p>Now Polaroid pictures weren&#8217;t the best, but a lot of people my age and older grew up with snapshots whirring from the front of a camera and slowly developing into view. When digital cameras came onto the scene, Polaroid stuck to its guns and thought the marketshare it had was permanent. It wasn&#8217;t, of course.</p>
<p>Sound familiar?</p>
<p>After some painful reorganization, it kept producing it&#8217;s standby product, but diversified, too. Layoffs kept coming, and I think you&#8217;d have a hard time finding an analyst telling you to buy Polaroid stock. The idea seemed sound. Keep producing film for artists and people who for whatever reason don&#8217;t want to use digital cameras, and branch out. But the niche Polaroid was trying to fill wasn&#8217;t profitable.</p>
<p>Now they&#8217;re coming up with new products, including a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/13/technology/13novel.html?_r=1&amp;th&amp;emc=th&amp;oref=slogin" target="_blank">portable printer</a> that connects to your cellphone&#8217;s camera and can print a 2&#215;3 picture. Not that they asked me, but I&#8217;m not sold on the idea. It has some value as a novelty, but you can look at the picture on the screen, and most people are content doing that. But it&#8217;s a good experiment.</p>
<p>The analyst at the end of the NYT article has a good quote, and one that everyone involved in innovation in any business should bear in mind:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">However ingenious the process, Mr. Hoffenberg of Lyra said, people might still not be tempted to convert camera clicks into prints.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">“Potential markets can exist because they aren’t tapped, but also because they aren’t actually a market,” he said. “It’s not always evident up front which is the case.”</p>
<p>Newspapers have long acted the way Polaroid did, but are branching out. They can&#8217;t wait any longer, though. Polaroid is a good example of what could happen if they did.</p>
<p>More tomorrow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.writinghurts.com/2008/04/14/polaroid-and-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
